|
Thursday, July 3, 2003
WiFi Bubble
As hotspots proliferate, The Economist asks if the WiFi boom is actually a bubble: Related Entries: [All]
SMBmeta
I have logn felt that the work being done by Dan Bricklin on defining the SMBmeta spec is very useful. Some time ago, Dan released a sample directory and sample code. A Burton Group article gives the wider context:
What needs to happen is that the SMBmeta interface and directories need to be combined with an RSS-based publish-subscribe mechanism to create an information marketplace. SMBmeta is too static; it needs a dynamic mechanism (which can be built via RSS publishing) to enable SMEs to find each other and do business. Related Entries: [All]
ISV Strategies
Eric Kidd offers some suggestions for independent software vendors (ISVs):
I think ISVs have to do all of the above to entertain any chances of winning. But I'd say that the most important strategy is to envision the future AND go ahead and create it. That is what we want to do.
An Integrated World
Thomas Friedman writes about how technology is bringing people closer and the impact it will have:
Harry crushes the Hulk
NYTimes has an interesting comparison: "On Saturday alone, J. K. Rowling's fifth novel sold five million copies nationwide. In a culture where little registers until it's measured in dollars, just do the math. Figure an average price of $20 a "Harry" (allowing for widely varying discounts on the $29.99 list price), and you have a one-day gross, as Variety would say, of $100 million. That's more money than the competing Hollywood fantasy, 'The Hulk,' brought in for its entire opening weekend ($62 million), and, assuming a very conservative average of two readers per book, a larger audience as well." In India too, the book sold something like 100,000 copies in a week. At Rs 650-odd per book, that is about Rs 6.5 crores (USD 1.4 million), which is more than the took of most hit Hindi movies in their opening week. Whoever thought book reading was out of fashion!
TECH TALK: An Affordable Alternative Technology Architecture for India’s BFSI Industry: Part 4
Open-source software has much wider usage. So far, we have been familiar for the use of Linux for mail (Sendmail), proxy (Squid), file and print (Samba) and web (Apache) servers. There is a lot more. There are databases like PostgreSQL and MySQL, there is an application server JBoss, there are open-source CRM and sales management applications like OpenCRM and Relata. In fact, there are open-source applications available for almost everything that one can think of. The problem is that many of these applications may not be “finished” or may have inadequate documentation and support. This is the opportunity for India’s software industry to build on top of and around these applications to make them industrial strength. The one issue unaddressed so far is that of the core banking applications. Most applications today are Windows-based or need Internet Explorer. This is where the co-operating banks need to put pressure on vendors to make their applications work on Linux or other browsers. Many database vendors and applications work on Linux (or another Unix variant) at the server-level. In fact, even if a collective of banks need to even finance the cost of getting applications re-written by vendors to support Linux and the other browsers, it will be well worth the investment. I am not suggesting that Indian banks do away with proprietary applications or slash their IT budgets. No. What they should look at is for hybrid solutions – a mix of open-source and proprietary applications will create a win-win solution for the banks and their customers. The most important requirement to make this happen is an open mind on the part of the technology decision-makers in banks. In fact, one of the side-effects of this could very well be that the proprietary solution vendors also start offering rationale pricing rather than dollar-denominated or monopolistic pricing. Banks should use their IT budgets to deepen the penetration of technology both in terms of employees having access to computing as well as the type of applications in use (for example, investments in knowledge management and data mining software). These ideas may seem quite radical and counter-intuitive. After all, banks and the financial services sectors many plenty of money. Why should they worry about reducing costs by going in for technology that may have not been used elsewhere in the world? Why should we be the guinea pigs? In fact, from the point of view of most managers, this is just the solution they should not want to try out – it is different, it is not Windows, it may be risky, and most importantly, the money being spent is not their money. The issue we need to consider as a nation is that of optimum utilisation of the limited resources that we have available and self-reliance. Expenditures on technology may not seem much when we as a nation are buying 2 million computers a year and running pirated software on more than 70% of these. Our nation of a billion people needs a technology infrastructure as much as it needs roads, power, food and water, if we are to realize the dream of being a developed nation in the coming years. The need of the hour is for disruptive innovations, and not status quo. Tomorrow: Part 5 Related Entries: [All]
|
Hi,
In sync with the topic, I would also like to mention that though WiFi is being touted as the next hot domain in the mass-technology segment after the internet, however the businesses embracing it will need to do a serious evaluation of their b-models. The analysis of the economic feasibility, or the catalytic advantage to their business profits, it all becomes too objective. What matters is not placing a new technology in place, making it sound like a new innovative business idea; but rather thinking clearly about the long term effects of such a decision and investment.
Here is what Seth Godin said in an interview with Indiatimes.com:
Question - How does a brand like Starbucks keep reinventing itself?
Answer - They did something interesting last year, which is that they wired one thousand of their stores with wireless Internet connections. So for people like me, and I’m in the minority, I would go across an entire town to sit in a Starbucks for five minutes and check my email. And I’d tell hundreds of people about this, because it changes the way I work when I’m on the road. So that was one remarkable thing they did, instead of doing more of the same. But the big challenge they’re going to have, is there are only so many three-dollar cappuccinos a person can drink everyday. And I think they have to embrace the fact that Starbucks isn’t going to keep growing the way it was, and they’re going to have to find something new -- maybe in the same building, maybe not -- that is remarkable all over again.
Posted by Gagan Kaul