|
Thursday, February 9, 2006
PC Software Wars
WSJ writes:
Digital Convergence
Irving Wladawsky-Berger writes:
Feed Grazing and Web 3.0
EirePreneur writes: "Danny Ayers is really grokking the idea of Feed Grazing and I love the del.icio.us mashup he's done to produce a dynamic OPML Reading List. The next step is to produce dynamic OPML hierarchies and we'll be well on our way to Web 3.0...It should be noted that I don't see Grazing as replacing Aggregation, but I do think it will become the dominant method of access to feed information - especially in an RSS-everywhere world."
New Computing Architecture
Nicholas Carr points to a Paul Strassman video and writes:
Korea's Mobile Future
The Korea Times writes:
TECH TALK: India Internet and Mobile: Connecting Indians
This backgrounder brings us to the second issue. What is required to service 300 million mainstream connected Indian consumers with diverse usability requisites & language barriers? Let us first segment the customer base. I like to look at this from two different viewpoints. The first, who these potential users are, and the second, what devices are being used. There are five segments in which users (and usage) can be classified: home users, small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), large enterprises, educational and rural. Of these, the large enterprise users are most likely to be like their brethren in the developed world – using mostly mid- to high-end desktops (and increasingly, wireless-enabled laptops) to get their work done. The two biggest opportunities in India are with home and SME users. The penetration of computers in both segments is about 10%: about 5 million out of 45 million middle and upper-middle class homes in urban and semi-urban India have computers, and about 1 in 10 of the 50-odd million infoworkers across SMEs have access to computers. There is very large ‘non-consumption’ across both segments. In education, there are about a million schools in India and 50,000 colleges which could use some form of computing facilities to assist in the education process. Rural India is starting to see the installation of kiosks with the likes of n-Logue and Drishtee active. Microsoft just announced a 50,000 kiosk program. The Department of Information Technology has plans to install 100,000. Considering India’s base of 600,000 villages, there’s a lot to be done to reach out to the population. The other way I like to look at the Indian market today is 10-20-30-40. There are 10 million Indians who have access to an owned PC at home and/or at work. They all have mobiles but their lives are primarily built around the computer. The next 20 million Indians have occasional access to the Internet via a cybercafe. Their digital lives are built around the mobile. This consists mainly of the youth segment. This segment is also a large consumer of the mobile value-added services. The next 30 million have no PC or Internet access, but use a mobile phone primarily for making and receiving phone calls. The next 40 million (or more) will get a mobile phone during the next 10-12 months. The focus of the mobile operators is primarily on the last 40 million – the next user base. This is not surprising – the Indian mobile user base will grow to 200+ million in the next 3 years and every one of the six national operators (Airtel, Reliance, BSNL-MTNL, Hutch, Idea and Tatas) hopes to end up with a sizeable market share. The mobile data opportunity in India lies in focusing on the needs of the first 30 million users – who are now ready to be beyond talk, text and the 2G services. Tomorrow: Connecting Indians (continued) Related Entries: [All]TECH TALK: India Internet and Mobile: What Others Say (Part 3) [February 17, 2006] TECH TALK: India Internet and Mobile: What Others Say (Part 2) [February 16, 2006] TECH TALK: India Internet and Mobile: What Others Say [February 15, 2006] TECH TALK: India Internet and Mobile: Role of Venture Capital (Part 2) [February 14, 2006] TECH TALK: India Internet and Mobile: Role of Venture Capital [February 13, 2006]
|
Google Killer: One new idea to kill google
Search engines don’t have any competition. Traditional media like newspapers and television reduce their ad rates to compete with their competitor newspapers and televisions. And as a result, their margins are always around the standard 10% mark.
But, in the case of search advertising, advertisers bid for ads. The business model is different. Methods for pricing of ads are different. Google’s profit margins in their web search engine excluding other new services may be as high as 50%. But, Google need not reduce their ad rates. Advertisers will continue to pay the current ad rates even if their Adwords program returns a profit margin of 80%. Because of this kind of business model, the one who benefits the most is the website where the ads are placed.
Search engines are the only winners.
But, something can be done here. We need a new model or system where search engines pay a part (a certain percent) of their revenue back to their advertisers. For example, a search engine, if it has a net profit margin of 40%, can give assurance that they will return 20% of the money paid by the advertisers back to them.
That is, advertisers can bid as usual, but all advertisers should get a fixed percent of the amount paid to search engines back from the search engines.
This give back can be fixed monthly or fixed dynamically, or, there are many options.
If this is done, the process of bidding will happen as usual and at the same time, the advertisers will see some competition.
As it is a well known fact that the profit margins of search engines are only going to rise in the future, this will help advertisers a lot. And, maybe, we may see the profit margins of search engines decline if such a system is introduced.
Are any of the search engines interested in doing this?
Posted by BalajiGoogle Killer: One new idea to kill google
Search engines don’t have any competition. Traditional media like newspapers and television reduce their ad rates to compete with their competitor newspapers and televisions. And as a result, their margins are always around the standard 10% mark.
But, in the case of search advertising, advertisers bid for ads. The business model is different. Methods for pricing of ads are different. Google’s profit margins in their web search engine excluding other new services may be as high as 50%. But, Google need not reduce their ad rates. Advertisers will continue to pay the current ad rates even if their Adwords program returns a profit margin of 80%. Because of this kind of business model, the one who benefits the most is the website where the ads are placed.
Search engines are the only winners.
But, something can be done here. We need a new model or system where search engines pay a part (a certain percent) of their revenue back to their advertisers. For example, a search engine, if it has a net profit margin of 40%, can give assurance that they will return 20% of the money paid by the advertisers back to them.
That is, advertisers can bid as usual, but all advertisers should get a fixed percent of the amount paid to search engines back from the search engines.
This give back can be fixed monthly or fixed dynamically, or, there are many options.
If this is done, the process of bidding will happen as usual and at the same time, the advertisers will see some competition.
As it is a well known fact that the profit margins of search engines are only going to rise in the future, this will help advertisers a lot. And, maybe, we may see the profit margins of search engines decline if such a system is introduced.
Are any of the search engines interested in doing this?
Posted by Balaji